Direct answer
opencode team routing gives teams a consistent way to decide which local profile and model lane should be used for each project. It is useful when opencode is one tool in a broader AI coding stack and the team needs common governance across providers.
When this matters
- A team uses opencode for local automation and Codex or Claude Code for specialized tasks.
- Profiles need to change by repo, task risk, and regional requirement.
- Managers want a single audit trail for switches across several AI coding CLIs.
Operating steps
- Add opencode to the allowed CLI list for each relevant profile.
- Map profile names to local account references and model lanes.
- Define fallback behavior for limit pressure or high-risk tasks.
- Export the config package and run the local switch command.
- Review the usage audit for route changes and rollback events.
Common risks
- Treating opencode separately from the rest of the agent stack can fragment policy.
- A missing account-reference registry can push teams back to manual config edits.
- No rollback state makes it hard to recover after the wrong profile is applied.
How AISwitchboard fits
AISwitchboard includes opencode in the same routing console as Codex and Claude Code, giving teams one switchboard for profiles, policy, and audit.